The useful points.
- Stills suit selected details and arrangements.
- Sequences help explain stages and movement.
- Interactive experiences suit discussions that need several viewpoints.
Use stills for a focused question
A few agreed views can show a product, its installation context or a proposed arrangement. They travel easily in a proposal and let the viewer focus on the intended detail. Define the important angles rather than requesting a large set without a purpose.
Use a sequence when order matters
A film can show staging, movement and placement in the order supplied by your team. Labels and pauses help the viewer follow important moments. Presentation timing can compress an operation; the film does not establish its real duration or validate the method.
Use exploration when the angle matters
An interactive scene lets a reviewer move between the whole arrangement and a selected detail. Navigation, inspection, measurement and delivery devices need to be scoped. A recorded walkthrough can demonstrate the controls; it is not a live browser session.
Match delivery to the meeting
Consider how the audience will receive the result. Stills fit a proposal document or a short email. A video gives a presenter control over the order of the explanation and can be replayed without learning navigation controls. An interactive environment is most useful when a discussion needs unplanned viewpoints, but it also needs a tested device, connection and suitable controls. Decide who will operate it during the meeting and whether a recorded fallback is needed. More features do not automatically make an explanation better; the delivery format should remove effort for the people reviewing it.
Start with a contained scope
One area, one object or one route may be enough for the first discussion. Agree the level of detail, technical reviewer, delivery format and revision round. Approved assets can support later work subject to rights and project changes.